|
Quigley and Watts Ltd Helping decision makers find solutions to improve the wellbeing of communities |
Submissions Analysis
Our team is very experienced in analysing submissions across topics. We use our strong analytical skills to code and analyse the submissions to produce a high quality, readable report. We are used to working to tight deadlines.
One client said this about our submissions analysis:
"Thanks for the report. It looks really good - thank you for taking our feedback on board so comprehensively! We are really pleased with the result"
- Project Manager, PHARMAC
- Project Manager, PHARMAC
The following are three examples of submissions analysis that our team has carried out.
Review Response Analysis on PHARMAC's Consumer Advisory Committee's Current Terms of Reference
| Who for | PHARMAC |
| Why | This was the first stage in PHARMAC's review of its Consumer Advisory Groups Terms of Reference . |
| What | Twenty three submissions were analysed. Though most submitters responded to the questions posed in the submission document, their comments were wide ranging and detailed. The analysis was completed with a report written in a two week timeframe. |
| Outcomes | PHARMAC will use the report to guide the update of the Terms of Reference and role of the Consumer Advisory Committee. |
Submissions Analysis of the Food and Nutrition Guidelines for Healthy Older people: A background paper
| Who for | Ministry of Health |
| Why | The background paper and guidelines were circulated to the food and nutrition sector to seek comment on the accuracy and appropriateness of the topics covered, the supporting evidence and the guidelines. |
| What | Thirty two submissions were analysed for this work, a substantial number of which were long and technical. Six questions were asked in the submission booklet but many submitters made comment well beyond the scope of the questions in long and detailed submissions. The work was completed within the timeframe requested. |
| Outcomes | The submissions analysis was used to update the background paper and guidelines. |
Submissions Analysis on the Draft Gambling Strategy
| Who for | Ministry of Health |
| Why | The Ministry is required to consult with stakeholders on the draft gambling strategy. The purpose of this work was to summarise and analyse stakeholders' views on the strategy for the Ministry so they could amend the strategy where required. |
| What | 65 submissions were analysed and a final report was presented to the Ministry within three weeks of getting the submissions. |
| Outcomes | The Ministry will use the submissions analysis to guide its revision of the Gambling Strategy before it is implemented. |
Review Response Analysis on PHARMAC's Consumer Advisory Committee's Current Terms of Reference
| Who for | PHARMAC |
| Why | This was the first stage in PHARMAC's review of its Consumer Advisory Groups Terms of Reference . |
| What | Twenty three submissions were analysed. Though most submitters responded to the questions posed in the submission document, their comments were wide ranging and detailed. The analysis was completed with a report written in a two week timeframe. |
| Outcomes | PHARMAC will use the report to guide the update of the Terms of Reference and role of the Consumer Advisory Committee. |
93 Cuba Mall  PO Box 24266 Wellington 6142 New Zealand | |
| Phone (04) 384 2049 Fax (04) 384 2048 Email office@quigleyandwatts.co.nz | |